Posts Tagged ‘urban poor’

Dissent and Debate at a time of Rapid Change: Experiences from Indian Cities

The Delhi Urban Platform invites you to a panel discussion on:

Dissent and Debate at a time of Rapid Change: Experiences from Indian Cities

Oct 29th, 6 pm
Centre De Sciences Humaines Lawns, 2 Aurangzeb Road, New Delhi

In this panel we ask participants to consider the issues of debate and dissent in contemporary urban development particularly since economic liberalization, based on their long-standing scholarly engagement with the rapid change that Indian cities have experienced in the last two decades. The panel comes in light of the Commonwealth Games in Delhi – both a process of city building and a focus for increasing censure. It will bring together scholars from Delhi, Bangalore and Mumbai to share their perspectives.

Traditionally and analytically, it has been suggested that the since economic liberalization, a dichotomous urban form has emerged, usually imagined as the eviction of poorer city residents to make way for newer forms of globalized urban development.

Given this, the panel seeks to ask:

- Whether this global template for urban upgradation/urban renewal has succeeded, and in what ways? Is the model entirely global?

- What is the role debate and dissent have played in its success and failure, and in the recent transformation of Indian cities?

- At what sites and spaces has any dissent and debate taken place, (for example within and outside of government, through politics, in the media)? To what effect?

- What are the forms and discourses that such debate and dissent are characterized by? Is there a model beyond debate and dissent that has emerged as an effective politics in the production of space?

- Finally and most significantly, how have governance strategies and policies either accommodated, co-opted or resisted efforts at debate, and in response to what kinds of urban actors?

We have with us as panelists:

1. Solomon Benjamin, Associate Professor, National Institute of Advanced Studies

2. Véronique Dupont, Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Research for Development, Paris

3. Diya Mehra, Centre de Sciences Humaines, New Delhi

4. Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal, Research Fellow, Centre for the Study of India and South Asia, Paris

5. Marie-Hélène Zérah, Senior Research Fellow, Centre de Sciences Humaines, New Delhi

Hoping very much to see you all at the discussion!

Delhi Urban Platform

Report: Image of the City

Guest post from a friend, Devika Narayan

I attended an intense and exciting discussion on Delhi where many people from different fields spoke.  The following is a patchwork of their words (more or less) . A total mishmash of voices, ideas and arguments. Hope it is some what coherent.

They talk repeatedly about Delhi and the loss of memory. The long, forgotten past which is erased from our collective memory. A pathological inability to recall the biographic journey that brought us to here. We advocate a sustained determined effort to unlock the gates of memory and end this distorting amnesia.

Indulge in guilty nostalgia. The Sarkari city of the 80s and the government bungalow, the open spaces and the fifty bird species in the garden. You become an easy intellectual target who is attacked for being a middle class romantic, longing for an invented past . But don’t dismiss nostalgia you say, drawing upon nostalgia as a technique of critiquing the present can be a useful exercise. However, while reconciling the experience of the endless centuries gone by with the chaotic present, one must also claim the future in a conscious way. The has been a lack of public debate when it comes imagining the future of Delhi. That is to say, debate about contemporary architecture, about housing, about alternative city plans are absent. We need to construct an imagination of the future in the most democratic and open way possible. City planning is not a technical process but is instead deeply political. We can not entrust the planning of the a city to ‘experts’ and ‘technicians’ whose objective is to mould cityscape as per the power of their will. We are trying to plan the poor out of existence-eliminating them from imaginings of the city, sweeping them off the map. Our city will never resemble a master plan. After all, how do you plan informality? Can you plan informality?

Read More...